These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Carotid artery trauma: management based on mechanism of injury.
    Author: Fabian TC, George SM, Croce MA, Mangiante EC, Voeller GR, Kudsk KA.
    Journal: J Trauma; 1990 Aug; 30(8):953-61; discussion 961-3. PubMed ID: 2388306.
    Abstract:
    Fifty-six patients with carotid injuries were reviewed (35 penetrating and 21 blunt). Shock correlated with a profound neurologic deficit on admission (p less than 0.03) in those with penetrating wounds. Thirty-one percent had primary repair, 25% had interposition grafting, 17% were ligated, and 17% were anticoagulated. Two graft failures resulted in death. Three blunt common carotid injuries followed direct cervical soft-tissue trauma; 18 internal carotid (ICA) dissections followed apparent extreme neck extension or flexion. Seven had bilateral ICA dissections (39%); none of these died. All dissections were diagnosed by angiography prompted by a change in the neurologic examination or an initial neurologic deficit unexplained by CT scan. Seventy-one percent had major associated injuries; 43% intra-abdominal solid viscus, 24% pelvis/long bone fractures, and 24% cervical spine/facial fractures. Dissections were treated with anticoagulation; 60% improved, 23% were unchanged, and 17% deteriorated. It is concluded that interposition grafting should be avoided if possible following penetrating wounds; liberal angiography is warranted with incompatible CT findings following blunt trauma; and anticoagulation is safe and effective therapy for blunt carotid dissections.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]