These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Biomonitoring of environmental tobacco smoke (ETS)-related exposure to 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK).
    Author: Michael Meger Irmtrud Meger-Kossien Kirsten Riedel Gerhard Scherer.
    Journal: Biomarkers; 2000; 5(1):33-45. PubMed ID: 23885904.
    Abstract:
    The exposure of non-smokers to the tobacco-specific N-nitrosamine 4-(N-methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK), a rodent lung carcinogen, was determined in the air of various indoor environments as well as by biomonitoring of non-smokers exposed to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) under real-life conditions using the urinary NNK metabolites 4-(N-methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol (NNAL) and [4-(N-methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)but-1-yl]-beta-O-D-glucosiduronic acid (NNAL-Gluc). NNK was not detectable (<0.5 ng m(-3)) in 11 rooms in which smoking did not occur. The mean NNK concentration in 19 rooms in which smoking took place was 17.5 (2.4-50.0) ng m(-3). The NNK levels significantly correlated with the nicotine levels (r=0.856; p< 0.0001). Of the 29 non-smokers investigated, 12 exhibited no detectable NNAL and NNAL-Gluc excretion (<3 pmol day) in their urine. The mean urinary excretion of NNAL and NNAL-Gluc of the 17 remaining non-smokers was 20.3 (<3-63.2) and 22.9 (<3-90.0) pmol day(-1), respectively. Total NNAL excretion (NNAL+NNAL-Gluc) in all non-smokers investigated significantly correlated with the amount of nicotine on personal samplers worn during the week prior to urine collection (r=0.88; <0.0001) and with the urinary cotinine levels (r=0.40; p=0.038). No correlation was found between NNAL excretion and the reported extent of ETS exposure. Average total NNAL excretion in the non-smokers with detectable NNAL levels was 74 times less than in 20 smokers who were also investigated. The cotinine/total NNAL ratios in urine of smokers (9900) and non-smokers (9300) were similar. This appears to be at variance with the ratios of the corresponding precursors (nicotine/NNK) in mainstream smoke (16400) and ETS (1000). Possible reasons for this discrepancy are discussed. The possible role of NNK as a lung carcinogen in non-smokers is unclear, especially since NNK exposure in non-smokers is several orders of magnitude lower than the ordinary exposure to exogenous and endogenous N-nitrosamines and the role of NNK as a human lung carcinogen is not fully understood.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]