These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Clinical outcomes of endoscopic carpal tunnel release in patients 65 and over.
    Author: Beck JD, Wingert NC, Rutter MR, Irgit KS, Tang X, Klena JC.
    Journal: J Hand Surg Am; 2013 Aug; 38(8):1524-9. PubMed ID: 23890496.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: To examine outcomes of endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) in patients 65 and older. We hypothesized that this population could expect relief of pain, night pain/numbness, and numbness. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of all patients 65 years of age and over who had ECTR for nerve conduction study-confirmed carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) from October 2007 to July 2010. The charts were reviewed for demographic data, symptoms and physical findings, patient satisfaction, and 3 patient-reported outcome scores. Preoperative and postoperative results for pain, night pain/numbness, and numbness were compared. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess whether age influenced symptom resolution. Boston carpal tunnel, Short Form-36 and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores were compared between patients with mild, moderate, or severe CTS. RESULTS: A total of 78 patients had ECTR. Their ages ranged from 65 to 93 years (mean, 73 y). Before surgery 69% of patients had constant numbness. Night pain/numbness was present in 65 patients before surgery, and 61 had complete resolution. All 70 patients who presented with pain reported complete relief by the 6-month follow-up. Following ECTR, the average Boston carpal tunnel symptom severity, functional status, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores were 1.5,1.5, and 13, respectively. At final evaluation, 79% of patients were very satisfied or satisfied with their outcome. A significant number of patients were found to have improvement in pain, night pain/numbness, and numbness following ECTR. CONCLUSIONS: This study has demonstrated relief of symptoms in a statistically significant number of patients following ECTR. We found that preoperative CTS severity, based on nerve conduction study result, did not significantly correlate with patient outcome following ECTR. Advanced symptoms at presentation do not preclude symptom resolution and should not be a contraindication to ECTR. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic III.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]