These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Radiofrequency ablation for treatment of colorectal liver metastases: scientific evidence and clinical reality].
    Author: Eisele RM, Chopra SS, Kubale R, Glanemann M.
    Journal: Zentralbl Chir; 2014 Apr; 139(2):193-202. PubMed ID: 23907842.
    Abstract:
    Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of colorectal liver metastases is frequently reported, but, however, lacks clear criteria for indication and reliable, convincing results with 5-year survival ranging from 17 to 48 %. RFA may be the appropriate treatment modality in approximately 3 to 5 % of all patients suffering from colorectal liver metastases. To date, RFA seems to be limited to no more than three metastases, each smaller than 3 cm. The main indication remains irresectability due to number, site, distribution and/or marginal liver function. Tumours in the vicinity of larger vessels (predominantly branches of portal or hepatic veins) are a case for controversy, since advances in hepatobiliary surgery enable a proportion of patients to undergo resections which would have been declared irresectable until most recently, and the oncological value of a thermoablation is questioned, as a certain amount of temperature is lost due to convective heat sinks. RFA is not a curative alternative to hepatic resection unless small tumours appear during open or laparoscopic procedures in a patient with elevated risk for early recurrence or postoperative morbidity following liver resection. The inclusion of RFA into a holistic system of oncological therapy is mandatory. Early RFA followed by systemic (regional?) chemotherapy can rather be recommended than chemo only, RFA only or first-line chemo with subsequent RFA.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]