These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Changes in Farr radioimmunoassay and EliA fluorescence immunoassay anti-dsDNA in relation to exacerbation of SLE.
    Author: Hillebrand JJ, Bernelot Moens HJ, Mulder AH.
    Journal: Lupus; 2013 Oct; 22(11):1169-73. PubMed ID: 23929638.
    Abstract:
    Measuring anti-dsDNA levels could support treatment adjustment during follow-up of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We investigated whether patients with exacerbations of SLE showed changes in anti-double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) levels prior to the exacerbation using the Farr and EliA assay and examined which assay showed highest specificity and predictive value for exacerbations. Changes in anti-dsDNA of ≥ 25% prior to exacerbation were considered of clinical significance. Exacerbations were retrospectively abstracted from medical records. Eighteen of 48 patients showed one or more exacerbations. We found 22 exacerbations with complete lab work-up, all accompanied by ≥ 25% change in anti-dsDNA in one or both assays. Only 10 exacerbations showed concordant changes in anti-dsDNA in both assays. Changes in anti-dsDNA had a low predictive value for exacerbations of SLE, but the specificity of anti-dsDNA changes for patients with exacerbations was higher for EliA than Farr. We conclude that despite the limited relation between anti-dsDNA changes and exacerbations of SLE, anti-dsDNA testing could still support clinical decision making when used in the correct setting. We conclude that EliA is preferable over Farr for assaying anti-dsDNA during follow-up of patients with SLE because of higher specificity, less "hands-on" time and absence of radioactivity.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]