These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Differences of radiological artefacts in cochlear implantation in temporal bone and complete head.
    Author: Diogo I, Franke N, Steinbach-Hundt S, Mandapathil M, Weiss R, Werner JA, Güldner C.
    Journal: Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 Mar; 15(2):112-7. PubMed ID: 23938153.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVES: Accurate radiological evaluation of cochlear implants is essential for improvement of devices and techniques and also for assessing the position of the electrodes within the cochlea. Radiological study of implants has focused on isolated temporal bones. Previous studies showed relevant sizes of artefacts (dimensions of the radiological image compared with the actual dimensions of the electrode) in visualization of cochlear implants in computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). In this study, we aimed to obtain CBCT images of cochlear electrodes in isolated temporal bones and in whole heads and to assess the differences in image quality between the two. METHODS: Cochlear electrodes were implanted in three complete human heads. Radiological examinations were performed using a single CBCT scanner with varying x-ray tube currents, voltages, and rotation angles. The temporal bones were then removed and the same radiological examinations were repeated, with and without the receiver coils. Artefacts from a basal electrode (electrode 9) and an apical electrode (electrode 2) were calculated. These were compared with each other by measuring the diameter of the image of the electrode (electrode inclusive of imaging artefacts) and with the real electrode diameters from the manufacturer's data. Additionally, the radiological diameters (inclusive of artefact) of the electrodes were compared to the cross-sectional diameters of the basal and apical coils of the cochlea at the locations of these two electrodes. RESULTS: In comparison to the real electrode diameters, radiological artefact proportions of 51-58% for electrode 9 and 56-61% for electrode 2 were calculated. The differences between whole head images (group 1) and temporal bone images with and without the receiver coil (groups 2 and 3) were highly significant for each protocol (P < 0.001). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: These results indicate that it is not possible reliably to determine the exact intracochlear positions of electrodes using CBCT. Imaging of isolated temporal bones produced significantly greater artefacts than imaging of the whole head. Evaluations of image quality based only on results for isolated temporal bones are not transferable to clinical situations, and should be assessed critically.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]