These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Six-year retrospective study of reconstructive options for defects of the skull base after resection of tumour.
    Author: Mohammed-Ali RI, Robbins AE, Hussain O, Fitzgerald A, Carroll T, Smith AT, Yousefpour A.
    Journal: Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Dec; 51(8):719-24. PubMed ID: 23954135.
    Abstract:
    The successful management of tumours that involve the skull base depends on resection and reconstruction of the defect. The challenge is to create a protective vascularised seal between the intracranial contents and the adjacent paranasal sinuses, nasopharynx, and oral cavity. Failure to create a protective barrier for the intracranial contents can result in cerebrospinal fistulas, potentially fatal infections, and radiotherapy being delayed. Local or regional flaps may be adequate for small defects, but larger ones require microsurgical free tissue transfer. As a part of the skull base surgical team, we present our experience in the reconstruction of defects after resection of tumours. A total of 41 patients had operations over a 6-year period from January 2004 to January 2010, and 26 free tissue transfer flaps and 20 local or regional flaps (46 flaps) were used for reconstruction. Ninety-two percent of the free flaps were successful. We also report details on disease, complications, and survival at 3, 6, and 12 months. Survival depended not only on the type of disease, coexisting conditions, and adequate resection of tumour, but equally on the reconstruction of the defect.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]