These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Head-to-head comparison of high-sensitivity troponin T and sensitive-contemporary troponin I regarding heart failure risk stratification. Author: de Antonio M, Lupón J, Galán A, Vila J, Zamora E, Urrutia A, Díez C, Coll R, Altimir S, Bayes-Genis A. Journal: Clin Chim Acta; 2013 Nov 15; 426():18-24. PubMed ID: 23978483. Abstract: BACKGROUND: High-sensitivity assays for cardiac troponins have recently become available, increasing the value of troponins in heart failure (HF) prognostication. We head-to-head compared the prognostic significance of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) and sensitive-contemporary cardiac troponin I (sc-cTnI) in an outpatient HF population. METHODS: We studied 876 patients, mainly of ischemic etiology (52.1%). Median left ventricular ejection fraction was 34%. Median follow-up was 3.45 years. Comprehensive statistical measurements of performance (discrimination, calibration, and reclassification) were obtained. RESULTS: hs-cTnT was ubiquitous in the patient cohort; sc-cTnI was detected in 276 patients (31.5%). During follow-up 311 patients died. According to multivariable Cox regression analysis, both hs-cTnT (HR 2.09, 95% CI 1.46-2.99, P<0.001) and sc-cTnI (HR 1.61, 95% CI 1.24-2.08, P<0.001) remained independent predictors of all cause and cardiovascular mortality. Using the best predictive cut-off point for both troponins calibration was better for hs-cTnT, which also reclassified a larger number of patients (NRI 9.0 [2.5;15.5] P = 0.007). The higher sensitivity of hs-cTnT permitted the identification of almost the double of deaths. CONCLUSION: Both hs-cTnT and sc-cTnI predict mortality in a real-life cohort of ambulatory HF patients. However, hs-cTnT showed globally better measures of performance and identified a higher proportion of decedents during follow-up.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]