These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Different recycle behavior of Cu2+ and Fe3+ ions for phenol photodegradation over TiO2 and WO3.
    Author: Wan L, Sheng J, Chen H, Xu Y.
    Journal: J Hazard Mater; 2013 Nov 15; 262():114-20. PubMed ID: 24018136.
    Abstract:
    Photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants on TiO2 and WO3 have been widely studied, but the effects of Cu(2+) and Fe(3+) ions still remain unclear. In this work, we have found that the recycle behavior of Cu(2+) and Fe(3+) are greatly dependent on the photocatalytic activity of metal oxide used. With TiO2 (P25, anatase, and rutile), all the time profiles of phenol degradation in water under UV light well fitted to the apparent first-order rate equation. On the addition of Cu(2+), phenol degradation on anatase, rutile and WO3 also followed the first-order kinetics. On the addition of Fe(3+), the initial rate of phenol degradation on each oxide was increased, but only the reactions on three TiO2 became to follow the first order kinetics after half an hour. The relevant rate constants for phenol degradation in the presence of Cu(2+) or Fe(3+) were larger than those in the absence of metal ions. Under visible light, phenol degradation on WO3 was also accelerated on the addition of Fe(3+) or Cu(2+). Moreover, several influencing factors were examined, including the metal ion photolysis in solution. It becomes clear that as electron scavengers of TiO2 and WO3, Fe(3+) is better than Cu(2+), while they are better than O2. We propose that Fe(3+) recycle occurs through H2O2, photogenerated from TiO2, not from WO3, while Cu(2+) regeneration on a moderate photocatalyst is through the dissolved O2 in water.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]