These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Non-therapeutic anti-Xa levels in medical patients receiving anticoagulant therapy with enoxaparin. Author: Ramos-Esquivel A, Salazar-Sánchez L. Journal: Thromb Res; 2013 Oct; 132(4):433-6. PubMed ID: 24050826. Abstract: INTRODUCTION: Anticoagulant activity of enoxaparin is not routinely monitored even when previous studies have shown a high pharmacological variability. The aim of this study is to determine the prevalence of non-therapeutic anti-Xa levels among medical patients using enoxaparin as anticoagulant therapy and to point out potential risk factors related to the risk of having a sub-therapeutic level. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Anti-Xa levels were measured in a cohort of sixty patients with medical indication for enoxaparin. Patients were categorized according to anti-Xa levels as follows: suboptimal anticoagulation (<0.5 IU/ml), optimal anticoagulation (between 0.5 and 1.2 IU/ml) or overanticoagulated (>1.2 IU/ml). Demographic and clinical variables and the use of concomitant medications were described for each group. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to assess the relationship between sub-optimal anticoagulation and potential predictive variables. A linear regression analysis was done to assess the relationship between anti-Xa activity, age, weight, body mass index, administered dose/weight and creatinine clearance. RESULTS: The mean anti-Xa activity was 0.71±0.32 UI/ml. Thirty one percent of patients had anti-Xa levels out of the therapeutic range, most of them (twenty-eight percent of total population) with a sub-therapeutic level. None of the variables were associated with the risk of a sub-therapeutic anti-Xa level. CONCLUSION: Almost one third of patients receiving enoxaparin had anti-Xa levels out of the therapeutic range. We need more studies to determine the clinical relevance of these findings.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]