These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: First immunochemotherapy outcomes in elderly patients with CLL: a retrospective analysis. Author: Michallet AS, Cazin B, Bouvet E, Oberic L, Schlaifer D, Mosser L, Salles G, Coiffier B, Laurent G, Ysebaert L. Journal: J Geriatr Oncol; 2013 Apr; 4(2):141-7. PubMed ID: 24071539. Abstract: BACKGROUND: To date, the majority of trials on chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) focused on patients considerably younger than the median age of onset for CLL. As a result, no definitive treatment exists for elderly patients, especially less medically fit patients. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study are to examine the impact of comorbidities on outcome as well as to compare three different therapeutic regimens in outcome efficacy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified 143 patients aged >65 years, who received fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR) (n=49), fludarabine and rituximab (FR) (n=74), or rituximab with chlorambucil (R-CLB) (n=20) as first initial immunochemotherapy. RESULTS: At current follow-up (median: 24 months), the proportion of patients with a clinical response was higher with FCR (75%) than FR (57%) and R-CLB (28%). For FCR, FR, and R-CLB patients, 2-year overall survival (OS) was 94%, 76%, and 73%, respectively, (p=0.14), while 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 90%, 58%, and 30% (p<0.001). In the fludarabine based regimen (FR and FCR) population, higher rituximab doses (500mg/m(2) vs. 375mg/m(2)) correlated with prolonged PFS. CONCLUSION: Despite the retrospective nature of this study, we demonstrate that elderly patients with CLL benefit from frontline immunochemotherapy, and emphasize the importance of maintaining rituximab dose intensity.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]