These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Laparoscopic excision of urachal remnants is a safe and effective alternative to open surgery in children. Author: Masuko T, Uchida H, Kawashima H, Tanaka Y, Deie K, Iwanaka T. Journal: J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2013 Dec; 23(12):1016-9. PubMed ID: 24073840. Abstract: BACKGROUND: An infected urachal remnant is an uncommon benign condition that usually recurs and has the potential to become malignant. This study aimed to review our experience in laparoscopic excision of urachal remnants and report the efficacy and outcomes of the procedure in children. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2010 and January 2012, five children with a median age of 35 months presented with urachal remnants at our institute. The data and treatment outcomes of all the patients were retrospectively reviewed. Laparoscopic surgery was performed using three ports, including the umbilical port. In all five children, the urachal remnant was excised from the umbilicus to the bladder dome by electrocauterization, and the stump on the bladder was ligated with endoloop sutures and some absorbable sutures. RESULTS: All the five procedures were completed successfully. The median pneumoperitoneum time was 75 minutes. The boundary between the normal bladder wall and the urachal remnant was clearly identified using a laparoscope, allowing excision of the remnant and muscle layer of the bladder wall. No intraoperative or postoperative complications were reported at a median follow-up of 16 months. Complete resection of the urachal remnant was confirmed by pathological evaluation. No symptom recurrences were encountered. Laparoscopic resection had good cosmetic outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic resection of urachal remnants in children allows for better anatomical visualization and may be considered as a safer, more effective, and more cosmetically beneficial alternative to open surgery.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]