These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Hemodynamic changes during neural deactivation in awake mice: a measurement by laser-Doppler flowmetry in crossed cerebellar diaschisis.
    Author: Takuwa H, Tajima Y, Kokuryo D, Matsuura T, Kawaguchi H, Masamoto K, Taniguchi J, Ikoma Y, Seki C, Aoki I, Tomita Y, Suzuki N, Kanno I, Ito H.
    Journal: Brain Res; 2013 Nov 06; 1537():350-5. PubMed ID: 24076448.
    Abstract:
    Crossed cerebellar diaschisis (CCD) caused by contralateral supratentorial lesions can be considered a condition of neural deactivation, and hemodynamic changes in CCD were investigated with positron emission tomography (PET) in humans. In the present study, to investigate the effects of neural deactivation on hemodynamics, we developed a new mouse model of CCD, which was caused by middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO), and measured changes in cerebellar blood flow (CbBF), red blood cell (RBC) velocity and concentration due to CCD using laser-Doppler flowmetry (LDF) in awake mice. The ratio of the CCD side to the unaffected side in the cerebellum for CbBF 1 day after MCAO was decreased by -18% compared to baseline (before CCD). The ratio of the CCD side to the unaffected side for RBC concentration 1 day after MCAO was decreased by -23% compared to baseline. However, no significant changes in the ratio of the CCD side to the unaffected side were observed for RBC velocity. The present results indicate that the reduction of CbBF induced by neural deactivation was mainly caused by the decrease in RBC concentration. In contrast, our previous study showed that RBC velocity had a dominant role in the increase in cerebral blood flow (CBF) induced by neural activation. If RBC concentration can be considered an indicator of cerebral blood volume (CBV), hemodynamic changes due to neural activation and deactivation measured by LDF in mice might be in good agreement with human PET studies.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]