These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Morphological evolution of subterranean mammals: integrating structural, functional, and ecological perspectives.
    Author: Lessa EP.
    Journal: Prog Clin Biol Res; 1990; 335():211-30. PubMed ID: 2408074.
    Abstract:
    The widely recognized convergence of subterranean mammals offers unique opportunities for the study of patterns, causes and consequences of morphological integration. For example, behavioral and biomechanical observations have revealed a diversity of digging modes among subterranean mammals. In rodents, scratch-digging and chisel-tooth digging, alone or combined, are widespread. This dual nature of the digging apparatus must be understood to avoid erroneous assessments of specializations based on forelimb modifications only. Additionally, bulldozing and disposal of loose soil is performed by head-lifting, by means of the forelimbs, or with the hindlimbs. Insectivores are known to resort to scratch-digging, sand-swimming, or to a unique system known as humeral rotation. Semi-fossorial species among rodents and insectivores are scratch-diggers. In contrast, fully subterranean taxa show further specializations for scratch-digging and/or resort to some of the other digging modes. The ecological correlates of these morphological trends are still poorly known; work in geomyids suggests that scratch-digging specializations are efficient in friable soils, whereas tooth-digging allows the utilization of a much broader spectrum of soil types. This indicates that alternative pathways of morphological specialization are not equivalent in their ecological potentialities. Important morphological features, such as incisor procumbency among tooth-diggers, are shown to be constrained by structural, allometric, and mechanical factors. In geomyids, the same procumbent morphologies may be acquired as a byproduct of size increases, by means of adaptive shifts independent from size, or by a combination of both. Thus, geometric similarity may not be indicative of functional similarity. Further constraints result from the integration of different functions. For instance, it is suggested that mastication imposes limitations upon potential modifications of jaw morphology for tooth-digging. Scratch-digging appears to be less constrained by locomotion, but the effects of integration of various functions in fore- and hind-limbs are largely unexplored. Multiple approaches, combining behavioral, functional, ecological, structural, and phylogenetic data, are necessary for the study of morphological evolution among subterranean mammals.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]