These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Predicting diagnostic error in radiology via eye-tracking and image analytics: preliminary investigation in mammography.
    Author: Voisin S, Pinto F, Morin-Ducote G, Hudson KB, Tourassi GD.
    Journal: Med Phys; 2013 Oct; 40(10):101906. PubMed ID: 24089908.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: The primary aim of the present study was to test the feasibility of predicting diagnostic errors in mammography by merging radiologists' gaze behavior and image characteristics. A secondary aim was to investigate group-based and personalized predictive models for radiologists of variable experience levels. METHODS: The study was performed for the clinical task of assessing the likelihood of malignancy of mammographic masses. Eye-tracking data and diagnostic decisions for 40 cases were acquired from four Radiology residents and two breast imaging experts as part of an IRB-approved pilot study. Gaze behavior features were extracted from the eye-tracking data. Computer-generated and BIRADS images features were extracted from the images. Finally, machine learning algorithms were used to merge gaze and image features for predicting human error. Feature selection was thoroughly explored to determine the relative contribution of the various features. Group-based and personalized user modeling was also investigated. RESULTS: Machine learning can be used to predict diagnostic error by merging gaze behavior characteristics from the radiologist and textural characteristics from the image under review. Leveraging data collected from multiple readers produced a reasonable group model [area under the ROC curve (AUC) = 0.792 ± 0.030]. Personalized user modeling was far more accurate for the more experienced readers (AUC = 0.837 ± 0.029) than for the less experienced ones (AUC = 0.667 ± 0.099). The best performing group-based and personalized predictive models involved combinations of both gaze and image features. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic errors in mammography can be predicted to a good extent by leveraging the radiologists' gaze behavior and image content.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]