These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Is the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration creatinine-cystatin C equation useful for glomerular filtration rate estimation in the elderly?
    Author: Liu X, Ma H, Huang H, Wang C, Tang H, Li M, Wang Y, Lou T.
    Journal: Clin Interv Aging; 2013; 8():1387-91. PubMed ID: 24143084.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate the performance of the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) creatinine-cystatin C equation in a cohort of elderly Chinese participants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was measured in 431 elderly Chinese participants by the technetium-99m diethylene-triamine-penta-acetic acid ((99m)Tc-DTPA) renal dynamic imaging method, and was calibrated equally to the dual plasma sample (99m)Tc-DTPA-GFR. Performance of the CKD-EPI creatinine-cystatin C equation was compared with the Cockcroft-Gault equation, the re-expressed 4-variable Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation, and the CKD-EPI creatinine equation. RESULTS: Although the bias of the CKD-EPI creatinine-cystatin C equation was greater than with the other equations (median difference, 5.7 mL/minute/1.73 m(2) versus a range from 0.4-2.5 mL/minute/1.73 m(2); P<0.001 for all), the precision was improved with the CKD-EPI creatinine-cystatin C equation (interquartile range for the difference, 19.5 mL/minute/1.73 m(2) versus a range from 23.0-23.6 mL/minute/1.73 m(2); P<0.001 for all comparisons), leading to slight improvement in accuracy (median absolute difference, 10.5 mL/minute/1.73 m(2) versus 12.2 and 11.4 mL/minute/1.73 m(2) for the Cockcroft-Gault equation and the re-expressed 4-variable MDRD equation, P=0.04 for both; 11.6 mL/minute/1.73 m(2) for the CKD-EPI creatinine equation, P=0.11), as the optimal scores of performance (6.0 versus a range from 1.0-2.0 for the other equations). Higher GFR category and diabetes were independent factors that negatively correlated with the accuracy of the CKD-EPI creatinine-cystatin C equation (β=-0.184 and -0.113, P<0.001 and P=0.02, respectively). CONCLUSION: Compared with the creatinine-based equations, the CKD-EPI creatinine-cystatin C equation is more suitable for the elderly Chinese population. However, the cost-effectiveness of the CKD-EPI creatinine-cystatin C equation for clinical use should be considered.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]