These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Surgical management and associated complications of penetrating rectal injuries sustained in Iraq and Afghanistan.
    Author: Brown SR, Swisher JP, Hofmann LJ, Coviello LC, Davis KG.
    Journal: Mil Med; 2013 Nov; 178(11):1213-7. PubMed ID: 24183768.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to analyze the surgical management and associated complications of penetrating rectal injuries sustained in Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed using the Joint Theater Trauma Registry. U.S. military personnel injured in Iraq and Afghanistan from October 2003 to November 2008 were included. The surgical management of rectal injuries was evaluated, specifically looking at the utilization of diversion with ostomy, distal washout, and presacral drainage. Complications were compared between the treatment groups. RESULTS: 57 patients who sustained a penetrating rectal injury were included in this study. Surgical management included diversion and ostomy alone in 34 patients (60%), diversion and distal washout in 11 patients (19%), diversion and drainage in 8 patients (14%), and diversion, distal washout, and drainage in 4 patients (7%). Complications were identified in 21% of patients. There were no deaths in the study group. Logistical regression failed to show a correlation between postoperative complications with either distal washout (p = 0.33) or presacral drainage (p = 0.9). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients were successfully managed with fecal diversion alone, suggesting that drainage and distal washout may be unnecessary steps in the management of high-velocity, penetrating rectal injuries.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]