These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Variation in patellofemoral kinematics due to changes in quadriceps loading configuration during in vitro testing.
    Author: Shalhoub S, Maletsky LP.
    Journal: J Biomech; 2014 Jan 03; 47(1):130-6. PubMed ID: 24268796.
    Abstract:
    This study investigated changes in patellofemoral (PF) kinematics for different loading configurations of the quadriceps muscle: single line of action (SL), physiological-based multiple lines of action (ML), weak vastus medialis (WVM), and weak vastus lateralis (WVL). Fourteen cadaveric knees were flexed from 15° to 120° knee flexion using a loading rig with the ability to load different heads of the quadriceps and hamstring muscles in their anatomical orientation. PF rotation in the sagittal plane) and medial lateral translation were significantly different (p<0.05) for SL and ML, with maximum differences of 2.8° and 0.9 mm at 15° and 45° knee flexion, respectively. Compared to the ML, the WVM induced an average lateral shift of 1.5mm and an abduction rotation of 0.8°, whereas a 0.9 mm medial shift and 0.6° adduction rotation was seen when simulating a WVL. The difference in the sagittal plane resultant force orientation of 26° between SL and ML was the major contributor to the change in PF rotation in the sagittal plane, while the difference in the frontal plane resultant force orientation of both the WVM and WVL from the ML (17° medial and 8° lateral, respectively) were the primary reasons for the change in PF frontal plane rotation and medial lateral translation. The two PF kinematic were significantly different from the ML for WVM and WVL (p<0.05). The results suggest that quadriceps muscle loading configuration can have a large influence on PF kinematics during full extension but less in deeper flexion. Therefore, using quadriceps single line loading for simulating activities with low flexion angles might not be sufficient to accurately replicate the physiological condition.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]