These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Detecting methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus: comparison of different phenotypic methods and the polymerase chain reaction.
    Author: Ahmad S.
    Journal: Br J Biomed Sci; 2013; 70(3):93-6. PubMed ID: 24273893.
    Abstract:
    Cefoxitin is a more potent inducer of the mecA regulatory system compared to oxacillin in Staphylococcus aureus. It has been recommended for the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) when using disk-diffusion testing. The aim of this study is to compare the results of cefoxitin and oxacillin disk-diffusion methods against the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the detection of MRSA. A total of 75 strains of S. aureus isolated from different clinical specimens (e.g., pus, blood, wound swabs, tracheal aspirates, eye swabs and cerebrospinal fluid [CSF]) were screened for methicillin resistance by PCR and cefoxitin and oxacillin disk-diffusion tests. The antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed by the Baur disk-diffusion method using oxacillin (1 microg) and cefoxitin (30 microg) disks on Mueller Hinton agar (MHA), and zone diameters as recommended by CLSIs were read at 18 h and 24 h. All MRSA isolates detected phenotypically were confirmed by PCR for the amplification of mecA and nucA genes. Of the 75 isolates screened, 27 were resistant to oxacillin, 30 were resistant to cefoxitin using the disk-diffusion method, while 30 isolates were confirmed as MRSA by PCR. Performing the cefoxitin disk-diffusion method using a 30 microg disk could be a reliable and more accurate method to detect methicillin resistance in S. aureus strains in situations where mecA PCR cannot be performed.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]