These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Experimental and FE displacement and polymerization stress of bonded restorations as a function of the C-Factor, volume and substrate stiffness.
    Author: Boaro LC, Brandt WC, Meira JB, Rodrigues FP, Palin WM, Braga RR.
    Journal: J Dent; 2014 Feb; 42(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 24296164.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVES: To determine the free surface displacement of resin-composite restorations as a function of the C-Factor, volume and substrate stiffness, and to compare the results with interfacial stress values evaluated by finite element analysis (FEA). METHODS: Surface displacement was determined by an extensometer using restorations with 4 or 6mm diameter and 1 or 2mm depth, prepared in either bovine teeth or glass. The maximum displacement of the free surface was monitored for 5 min from the start of photoactivation, at an acquisition rate of 1s(-1). Axisymmetric cavity models were performed by FEA. Structural stiffness and maximum stresses were investigated. RESULTS: For glass, displacement showed a stronger correlation with volume (r=0.771) than with C-Factor (r=0.395, p<0.001 for both). For teeth, a stronger correlation was found with C-Factor (r=0.709; p<0.001) than with volume (r=0.546, p<0.001). For similar dimensions, stress and displacement were defined by stiffness. Simultaneous increases in volume and C-Factor led to increases in stress and surface displacement. Maximum stresses were located at the cavosurface angle, internal angle (glass) and at the dentine-enamel junction (teeth). The displacement of the restoration's free surface was related to interfacial stress development. CONCLUSIONS: Structural stiffness seems to affect the shrinkage stress at the tooth/resin-composite interface in bonded restorations. Deep restorations are always problematic because they showed high shear stress, regardless of their width. FEA is the only tool capable of detecting shear stress due to polymerization as there is still no reliable experimental alternative.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]