These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: [Feasibility and safety of CT-guided percutaneous needle biopsy and subsequent iodine-125 seed interstitial implantation for pancreatic cancer]. Author: Yu YP, Jiang HT, Yao Z, Xia QR, Hong FM, Zeng H, Li S. Journal: Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2013 Aug; 35(8):608-12. PubMed ID: 24314220. Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To discuss the feasibility and safety of different approaches for CT-guided percutaneous needle biopsy and subsequent iodine-125 seed interstitial implantation for pancreatic cancer. METHODS: A retrospective study was carried out on the complete data of 35 patients with pancreatic cancer who have received CT-guided percutaneous needle biopsy with or without subsequent iodine-125 seed interstitial implantation. There were 9 lesions located in the head of pancreas, 20 located in the body, and 6 in the tail. The maximum diameter of the lesions varied from 12 mm to 60 mm (mean 37.1 mm). The patients were treated with a needle in diameter of 16-21G. Operations were undertaken via anterior, posterior and lateral approaches. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients underwent 43 times of CT-guided percutaneous needle biopsies. Thirty-one cases were pathologically diagnosed as cancer, 2 cases inflammatory lesions, and 2 were suspected tumors (one of which was finally diagnosed as cancer, while another was pancreatic pseudocyst). The ratio of correct diagnosis was 94.3%. Fourteen patients were treated subsequently with CT-guided iodine-125 seed interstitial implantation therapy, with a total of 65 times of needle puncture. The operations were performed via direct approach to the tumor in 18 cases, transhepatic approach in 2 cases, transgastric approach in 4 cases, transintestinal approach in 10 cases, and through mesenteric vessels in one case. Incidence of complications in the biopsy group was 2.32% (1/43), and in the implantation group was 6.15% (4/65), with a statistically non-significant difference (P = 0.600) between the two groups. Incidence of complications in the group using 16-18G needle was 4.65% (4/86), while in the group using 20-21G needle was 4.55% (1/22), also with a non-significant difference (P = 0.064). The accuracy rate of needle biopsy in this study was 94.28% (33/35). CONCLUSION: CT-guided percutaneous needle biopsy and subsequent iodine-125 seed interstitial implantation are both feasible and safe for pancreatic cancer.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]