These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Electrocardiographically gated ¹¹C-hydroxyephedrine PET for the simultaneous assessment of cardiac sympathetic and contractile functions. Author: Magota K, Hattori N, Manabe O, Naya M, Oyama-Manabe N, Shiga T, Kuge Y, Yamada S, Sakakibara M, Yoshinaga K, Tamaki N. Journal: Ann Nucl Med; 2014 Apr; 28(3):187-95. PubMed ID: 24323747. Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Application of the electrocardiographically (ECG) gated positron emission tomography (PET) technique with (11)C-hydroxyephedrine (HED) would allow the simultaneous assessment of cardiac sympathetic and contractile functions. However, there are uncertainties regarding the diagnostic accuracy of left ventricular (LV) volume measurements using ECG-gated HED-PET. The purpose of this study was to clarify the minimal requirement of count statistics to measure LV volumes with ECG-gated HED-PET and to investigate the reliability of the measurements. METHODS: Five healthy volunteers and 11 patients with heart failure underwent a 40-min list-mode PET scan after an injection of HED (197 ± 35 MBq). The list-mode data were histogrammed into multiple sets of acquisition periods at 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 12.0 Mcount/bin and reconstructed into corresponding gated images using an iterative algorithm. The LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), the LV end-systolic volume (LVESV), and the LV ejection fraction (LVEF) were calculated in each acquisition period. These values were compared with those obtained by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Possible effects of HED retention on the accuracy of the volume measurements were investigated. RESULTS: Collecting less than 4.0 Mcount/bin resulted in noisy cardiac images. The lower counts resulted in underestimation in the volume measurements. Reasonably accurate volume measurements required equal to or greater than 6.0 Mcount/bin. This corresponded to 7.0 ± 1.9 min (range, 4.0-10.3 min) for the acquisition period. Volumetric results using the 6.0 Mcount/bin data highly correlated with cardiac MRI (LVEDV: r = 0.85, p < 0.0001; LVESV: r = 0.89, p < 0.0001; LVEF: r = 0.77, p < 0.01). The HED retention did not affect the volumetric results compared to the MRI volumetry. CONCLUSIONS: The volumetric accuracy with ECG-gated HED-PET was affected by the count statistics rather than the HED retention. LV volume measurements were feasible with 10-min acquisition period for most of the patients. This technique allows the simultaneous assessment of cardiac sympathetic and contractile functions without the need for an additional injection or scanning time, thus reducing overall costs for diagnostic imaging.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]