These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Mesenterico-portal vein resection in patients with pancreatico-duodenal cancer is safe and may increase survival.
    Author: Storkholm JH, Hansen CP.
    Journal: Dan Med J; 2014 Jan; 61(1):A4757. PubMed ID: 24393587.
    Abstract:
    INTRODUCTION: Pancreatic cancer is one of the most serious gastrointestinal cancers, and in the US and Europe it is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality. Radical surgery is the only option available for long-term survival. The aim of this study was to describe the surgical technique and the results of portal vein/superior mesenteric vein resection in patients with pancreatic cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between 1 April 2009 and 1 April 2013, 354 patients underwent resection for pancreatic malignancy. A total of 47 portal vein/superior mesenteric vein resections were performed in 22 men and 25 women. RESULTS: A total of 44 patients (93.7%) had ductal adenocarcinomas. In all, 39 patients (83%) had T3 tumours, and 38 patients (80.9%) had involvement of lymph nodes. Furthermore, 29 patients (62%) had a pancreaticoduodenectomy, 15 patients (32%) a total pancreatectomy and three patients (6%) had a distal pancreatectomy. Six patients (17%) were reconstructed with interposition grafts, and vessels (83%) were reconstructed with an end-to-end anastomosis in the remaining 39 patients. Surgical morbidity was 29.8%, and 19.1% had non-surgical complications. The perioperative mortality (30 days) was 0%. The median survival was 25.2 months (confidence interval: 19-31.4). CONCLUSION: Resection of the portal vein/superior mesenteric vein is a safe procedure. It is not associated with an increased perioperative morbidity and mortality. This latter finding is in accordance with the findings in other high-volume centres. The median survival was far better than expected, especially since our material included a considerable number of patients with lymph node metastases. FUNDING: not relevant. TRIAL REGISTRATION: not relevant.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]