These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Pain control in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated by percutaneous radiofrequency ablation: comparison of the efficacy of one-shot and continuous intravenous fentanyl delivery.
    Author: Yokoyama K, Ikeda O, Kawanaka K, Nakasone Y, Inoue S, Tamura Y, Yamashita Y.
    Journal: Acta Radiol; 2014 Dec; 55(10):1219-25. PubMed ID: 24413224.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Hepatic percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is usually performed with the patient under deep intravenous (i.v.) sedation or general anesthesia. Nonetheless, many patients report pain during and/or after the procedure. PURPOSE: To perform a prospective study of pain control obtained by the i.v. one-shot delivery and the continuous i.v. infusion of fentanyl in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated by RFA. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between April 2007 and March 2010, 83 patients with 106 HCCs underwent percutaneous RFA. All HCCs were addressed by computed tomography (CT)-guided percutaneous RFA performed within 5 h of embolization of the tumor vessels with iodized oil and gelatin sponges. Standard anesthesia consisted of 10 mL of 1% lidocaine injected locally. For conscious sedation, group one patients (n = 41) were injected i.v. with 100 µg of fentanyl before and 100 µg of fentanyl 30 min after percutaneous RFA. In group two (n = 42) we delivered fentanyl by continuous i.v. infusion at 100 µg/h during RFA. Upon request, patients in both groups also received 5 mg of diazepam i.v. for pain during the RFA procedure. The severity of pain experienced by all patients was evaluated on a visual analogue scale (VAS) and complications elicited by the anesthesia regimens were recorded. We also assessed the effectiveness of the treatment on sequential follow-up CT and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 3-month intervals. RESULTS: Percutaneous RFA was technically successful in all 83 patients. Two patients in group one (4.8%) and one patient in group two (2.4%) manifested residual enhancement 3 months post RFA. There was no significant difference in the local recurrence rate between the two groups. At 4.0 ± 1.8 for group one and 3.4 ± 1.9 for group two, the VAS score was not significantly different. Major fentanyl or diazepam toxicity was recorded in 11 patients (24.4%) in group one and two patients (4.8%) in group two; the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The continuous infusion of fentanyl provided effective and safe analgesia in HCC patients undergoing percutaneous RFA.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]