These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: [Serum levels and significance of HIF-1α and HIF-2α in healthy Tibetan and Han residents at different altitudes].
    Author: Guan W, Li X, Yang YZ, Wang J, Feng XY, Xu JH.
    Journal: Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Oct 15; 93(38):3057-9. PubMed ID: 24417928.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To explore the serum levels and significance of hypoxic inducible factor (HIF)-1α and HIF-2α in Tibetan and Han residents living at different altitudes. METHODS: A total of 100 healthy adults of Han in plain (altitude 5 m, group P) and Tibetan and Han at moderate altitude (2260 m, groups M1 & M2) and high altitude (4380 m, groups H1 & H2) (n = 20 each) were selected from June 2010 to August 2010. Venous blood samples were collected in the morning. The serum concentrations of HIF-1α and HIF-2α were measured with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to analyze the correlations of HIF-1α and HIF-2α with arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) and hemoglobin (Hb). RESULTS: The level of HIF-1α in group H2 ( (6.06 ± 1.85) µg/L) was higher than that in groups P ( (4.56 ± 0.85) µg/L, P < 0.05) , M1 ((4.41 ± 1.05) µg/L, P < 0.01) and M2 ( (4.59 ± 1.03) µg/L, P < 0.05) . The level of HIF-1α in group H1 ( (5.27 ± 0.98) µg/L) was higher than that in group M1 (P < 0.05) . The level of HIF-2α in group H2 ((0.83 ± 0.48) µg/L) was higher than that in groups P ((0.33 ± 0.11) µg/L, P < 0.01), M1 ((0.14 ± 0.06 )µg/L, P < 0.01) and M2( (0.24 ± 0.11) µg/L, P < 0.01) . The level of HIF-2α in group M1 was lower than that in groups P (P < 0.01) and M2 (P < 0.01). The level of HIF-2α in group H1((0.18 ± 0.16)µg/L) was lower than that in groups P (P < 0.05) and H2 (P < 0.01) . The levels of HIF-1α and HIF-2α were negatively correlated with PaO2 (r = -0.475, -0.551, both P < 0.01) and positively with Hb in Han groups (r = 0.433, 0.463, all P < 0.01). The levels of HIF-1α and HIF-2α had no correlation with PaO2 in Tibetan groups (r = -0.270, -0.198, both P > 0.05). No correlation existed between HIF-1α and Hb in Tibetan. A positive correlation existed between HIF-2α and Hb in Tibetan (r = 0.325, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The changes of HIF-1α and HIF-2α vary for Tibetan and Han residents at different altitudes. And the level of HIF-2α is consistent with the change of Hb. As compared with HIF-1α, HIF-2α may play a more important role in regulating Hb.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]