These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Does robotic distal pancreatectomy surgery offer similar results as laparoscopic and open approach? A comparative study from a single medical center.
    Author: Duran H, Ielpo B, Caruso R, Ferri V, Quijano Y, Diaz E, Fabra I, Oliva C, Olivares S, Vicente E.
    Journal: Int J Med Robot; 2014 Sep; 10(3):280-5. PubMed ID: 24431290.
    Abstract:
    INTRODUCTION: In the field of pancreatic surgery, robotic surgery has yet to be evaluated against open and laparoscopic approaches. The outcomes of robotic surgery for distal pancreatectomy were analysed and the results compared with those of laparoscopic and open procedures. METHODS: Retrospective reviews were made of 47 patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy at our institution between 2008 and 2013 with three different approaches: 16 robotic, 18 laparoscopic and 13 open surgeries. RESULTS: A significant difference was observed in blood loss in the open group (mean 3.44 units) compared with the robotic (mean 0.5 units) and laparoscopic (0 units) technique (P  = 0.046). A shorter hospital stay was observed for the robotic group (8.87 days) compared with the laparoscopic (19.16 days) and open groups (20.44 days) (P = 0.035). Morbidity was lower in the robotic group (0%) compared with the Laparoscopic (44%) and Open groups (46%) (P = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the proposition that robotic distal pancreatectomy is as safe as the laparoscopic approach.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]