These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Three-drug combination chemotherapy for advanced urothelial tract carcinoma.
    Author: Ohshima S, Ono Y, Fujita T, Aso Y.
    Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol; 1987; 20 Suppl():S20-3. PubMed ID: 2444354.
    Abstract:
    A prospective chemotherapeutic trial using combinations of three drugs consisting of three different protocols was performed in 24 patients with advanced transitional-cell carcinoma of the urothelial tract between April 1981 and August 1986. All patients had histologically proven transitional-cell carcinoma and bidimensionally measurable lesions. The protocol I (PPA) was a 5-day course of treatment with 20 mg/m2 cis-platinum and 5 mg/m2 peplomycin (a derivative of bleomycin) on days 1-5, and 25 mg/m2 adriamycin on day 1. Protocol II (CFMit) was a 10-day course with 3 mg/m2 mitomycin-C and 300 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide on day 1, and 180 mg/m2 5-fluorouracil on days 1-10. Protocol III (PAM) was a 1-day course comprising 60 mg/m2 cis-platinum, 30 mg/m2 adriamycin, and 40 mg/m2 methotrexate. In protocols I and III, the drugs were administered every 4-5 weeks, while in protocol II, the drugs were administered continuously without any interval. Of the 9 patients who received 1 to 5 PPA courses, only 3 patients showed a minor response. In the 10 patients who received 4 to 44 CFMit courses, 3 (33%) achieved partial remission for 1.5-22 months, and 3 had a minor response. Of the 5 patients receiving 3 to 7 PAM courses, 1 patient achieved partial remission for 5 months, and 1 had a minor response. Myelosuppression, nausea, vomiting, and anorexia were frequently observed in each protocol. Loss of hair was often observed in protocols I and III. Stomatitis and diarrhea were observed in protocol II. Three patients in protocol I, 4 patients in protocol II, and 1 patient in protocol III were unable to tolerate more courses of the regimen due to the severe side effects.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]