These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Validity of minimal clinically important difference values for the multiple sclerosis walking scale-12?
    Author: Motl RW, Learmonth YC, Pilutti LA, Dlugonski D, Klaren R.
    Journal: Eur Neurol; 2014; 71(3-4):196-202. PubMed ID: 24457548.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) values of 4 and 6 points have been proposed for interpreting meaningful change in Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale-12 (MSWS-12) scores. This study examined the validity of those MCID values based on capturing corresponding changes in other walking outcomes in persons with multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS: On 2 occasions separated by 6 months, 82 persons with MS completed the MSWS-12, timed 25-ft walk (T25FW), 6-min walk (6MW), and gait analysis, and then wore an accelerometer over a 7-day period. We generated change scores for the MSWS-12 and formed groups of stable, worsened, and improved perceived walking based on both 4- and 6-point changes. The groups were compared for corresponding changes in other walking measures over time using mixed-model ANOVAs. RESULTS: The mixed-model ANOVAs did not identify statistically significant group-by-time interactions on the T25FW (p = 0.98 and p = 0.67), the 6MW (p = 0.89 and p = 0.72), gait (p = 0.54 and p = 0.21), or accelerometry (p = 0.40 and p = 0.68) for MCID values of 4- or 6-point changes in MSWS-12 scores. CONCLUSIONS: We did not confirm that MCID values of 4 and 6 points for the MSWS-12 correspond with changes in performance, gait, and free-living assessments of walking in MS.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]