These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Combined intervention of preconditioning and postconditioning against cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury].
    Author: Jiang W, Liu Q, Yuan X.
    Journal: Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2014 Jan; 39(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 24473383.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the protective effect of combined ischemic preconditioning and postconditioning against cerebral ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury and the potential mechanism. METHODS: Sixty SD rats were randomized into a sham operation group, a brain I/R group (model group), a brain I/R plus preconditioning group (preconditioning group), a brain I/R plus postconditioning group (postconditioning group), and a brain I/R plus preconditioning and postconditioning group (combined intervention group). The rat brain I/R injury model was created by suture emboli method. Preconditioning was induced by 3 cycles of 15 s occlusion followed by 30 s recanalization of the middle cerebral artery twice respectively at 24 h and 1 h before model creation, and postconditioning was elicited by 3 cycles of 30 s reperfusion followed by 15 s ischemia before long time reperfusion. The rats were sacrificed at 48 h after the reperfusion. The cerebral infarct volume and oxidative stress parameters as well as p-Akt and p-ERK1/2 protein expressions in the brain tissues were determined. RESULTS: The cerebral infarct volumes showed no significant difference between the preconditioning group and the postconditioning group (P>0.05), but both were smaller than that in the model group and larger than that in the combined intervention group (all P values<0.01). In the model group, the level of oxidative stress was markedly increased (SOD activity increased and MDA level decreased), and both p-Akt and p-ERK1/2 protein expressions in the brain tissues were upregulated compared with those in the sham group (all P<0.01). Compared with the model group, the oxidative stress parameters presented no evident difference in preconditioning group (P>0.05), but p-Akt expression was slightly upregulated and p-ERK1/2 was remarkably down-regulated (P<0.05 and P<0.01) In the postconditioning group, the level of oxidative stress was significantly decreased, and p-Akt expression was dramatically increased with a mild down-regulation of p-ERK1/2 expression (P<0.01 and P<0.05). In the combined intervention group, the oxidative stress decrease the p-Akt expression rise and p-ERK1/2 expression inhibition were significantly greater than those in either the preconditioning group or the postconditioning group (all P values<0.01). CONCLUSION: Combined treatment of preconditioning and postconditioning exerts stronger protective effect against cerebral I/R injury than either preconditioning or postconditioning alone. The mechanism is possibly due to the different but complementary protection of preconditioning and postconditioning against I/R injury.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]