These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Use of synthetic peptides to identify an N-terminal epitope on mouse gamma interferon that may be involved in function.
    Author: Magazine HI, Carter JM, Russell JK, Torres BA, Dunn BM, Johnson HM.
    Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1988 Feb; 85(4):1237-41. PubMed ID: 2448795.
    Abstract:
    We previously have assigned N-terminal specificity to three hamster monoclonal antibodies (mAbs I, II, and III) produced to mouse recombinant gamma interferon (IFN-gamma), based on the ability of the N-terminal peptide IFN-gamma-(1-39) to block binding of 125I-labeled IFN-gamma (125I-IFN-gamma) and on the ability of these antibodies to bind 125I-IFN-gamma-(1-39). Only mAb I blocked function and binding to the IFN-gamma receptor, suggesting that it may bind to a region of the molecule involved in interaction with the receptor. To further define the epitope specificities of the antibodies, a series of N-terminal peptides were synthesized and tested for their ability to block antibody binding of 125I-IFN-gamma. Peptides IFN-gamma-(1-39), IFN-gamma-(1-20), IFN-gamma-(3-20), and IFN-gamma-(5-20) inhibited binding of 125I-IFN-gamma by mAb I in order of decreasing effectiveness, while peptide IFN-gamma-(7-20) was without effect. Peptides IFN-gamma-(1-39), IFN-gamma-(1-20), and IFN-gamma-(3-20) also inhibited binding of 125I-IFN-gamma by mAb II but were less effective when compared with their inhibition of mAb I. IFN-gamma-(5-20) and IFN-gamma-(7-20) did not inhibit binding by mAb II. Peptides IFN-gamma-(1-10), IFN-gamma-(10-30), and IFN-gamma-(21-44) did not inhibit either mAb I or mAb II. While IFN-gamma-(1-39) and IFN-gamma-(10-30) inhibited binding by mAb III, neither IFN-gamma-(1-20) nor any of its truncated forms were inhibitory. All three antibodies had similar Kd values for 125I-IFN-gamma. A prediction of the secondary structure of the molecule and the peptide inhibition data suggest that the epitope (possible receptor binding region) for mAb I involves a loop in the area containing residues 12-20, with sequences N-terminal to these residues possibly stabilizing the loop conformation. Direct evidence that the N-terminal 1-39 region of IFN-gamma is important in receptor binding was the observation that IFN-gamma-(1-39), but not the C-terminal IFN-gamma-(95-133), competed with 125I-IFN-gamma for the receptor on mouse L cells. IFN-gamma-(1-39) also specifically blocked IFN-gamma antiviral activity at concentrations that blocked binding to the receptor. The fact that IFN-gamma-(1-39) was the only peptide that blocked both IFN-gamma binding to receptor and function is consistent with the antibody competition data, where it was the most effective peptide in blocking binding of 125I-IFN-gamma by the N-terminal-specific mAbs. The combination of peptide mapping of epitope specificities and receptor competition should further help define the structural basis for IFN-gamma action.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]