These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Different methods for the diagnosis of endometrial histological comparative study].
    Author: Leng X, Wang M, Zhang SL, Wang D, Cao W, Yang XH.
    Journal: Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Dec; 48(12):891-5. PubMed ID: 24495679.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of endometrial sampler Pipelle for endometrial histologic diagnosis. METHODS: Using prospective and self-control methods, 200 patients with endometrial biopsy firstly used Pipelle endometrial sampler for endometrial tissue, then followed by diagnostic curettage, the same pathologist evaluated the specimen quality and made the histologic diagnosis. RESULTS: Totally 200 patients completed the observation, the specimen satisfaction of Pipelle was 93.0% (in this 200 cases, 186 cases were satisfactory), its pathological accuracy was 85.0% (in this 200 cases, 170 cases' pathological results are highly consistent with diagnostic curettage). There was no significant difference between two kinds of endometrial sampling (P > 0.05). There was no pain for patients during the Pipelle using process. CONCLUSION: Pipelle could obtain satisfactory samples used for histological diagnosis in normal endometrium, simple hyperplasia, complex hyperplasia, atypical hyperplasia and endometrial cancer disease, because its pathological accuracy is so close to the diagnostic curettage, which may be used as a routine screening tool of endometrial diseases.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]