These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Assessment of detection assays of Epstein-Barr viral Rta-IgG, VCA-IgA, EA-IgA and Epstein-Barr viral DNA at different clinical stages in the diagnosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma].
    Author: Luo YL, Chen H, Peng SG, Lin JH, Huang PY.
    Journal: Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Nov 26; 93(44):3516-9. PubMed ID: 24521892.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the values of combined detection method of EB viral Rta-IgG, VCA-IgA, EA-IgA and EB viral DNA in the diagnosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). METHODS: Serum and plasma samples from 131 untreated NPC patients, 52 non-NPC patients with NPC-like symptoms and 148 healthy donors from January to December 2012 were collected. Immunoenzymatic staining was used to detect VCA-IgA and EA-IgA in sera. ELISA was performed to detect Rta-IgG antibody in sera and real-time fluorescent quantitative PCR for measuring EBV DNA in plasma. The clinical characteristics of 3 groups were compared. ROC curve and correlation analyses were performed to assess the detection assays for the diagnosis of NPC. RESULTS: The positive rates of EBV Rta-IgG, VCA-IgA, EA-IgA and EBV DNA in untreated NPC patient group were higher than those in other two groups. The differences were statistically significant (all P < 0.01). The differences of Rta-IgG antibody positive rates, EBV-DNA levels and EBV-DNA positive rates at different clinical stages were statistically significant (all P < 0.05). The positive rates of VCA-IgA and EA-IgA were not related with clinical stages (P > 0.05). Areas under ROC curve for Rta-IgG and EBV-DNA were 0.901 and 0.827 respectively. All four diagnostic assays demonstrated excellent efficiency. The sensitivity and specificity of individual assays were as follows: Rta-IgG: 77.9%, 92.5%; VCA-IgA 93.1%, 91.5%; EA-IgA: 74.8%, 99.5%; EBV-DNA 64.9%, 97.0%. The sensitivity and specificity of combined assays were 97.7% and 83.5% respectively. CONCLUSION: Combined detection method of EB viral Rta-IgG, VCA-IgA, EA-IgA and EB viral DNA are efficient for the diagnosis of NPC.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]