These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Assessment of [(18)F]-fluoroacetate PET/CT as a tumor-imaging modality: preclinical study in healthy volunteers and clinical evaluation in patients with liver tumor.
    Author: Takemoto K, Hatano E, Nishii R, Kagawa S, Kishibe Y, Takahashi M, Yamauchi H, Matsumura K, Zaima M, Toriguchi K, Tanabe K, Kitamura K, Seo S, Taura K, Endo K, Uemoto S, Higashi T.
    Journal: Ann Nucl Med; 2014 May; 28(4):371-80. PubMed ID: 24599824.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: Although [(18)F]-FDG is a useful oncologic PET tracer, FDG uptake is known to be low in a certain type of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). [(18)F]-fluoroacetate ((18)F-FACE) is an [(18)F] fluorinated acetate, which is known to be converted into fatty acids, incorporated in membrane and is expected to be a promising oncologic PET tracer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of (18)F-FACE as an oncologic PET tracer in preclinical study in healthy volunteers and in patients with liver tumors. METHODS: Twenty-four healthy volunteers (age 48.2 ± 12.9 years old; 15 male and 9 female) and ten patients with liver tumor (age 72.1 ± 7.0 years old; 6 male and 4 female) were included. We performed whole-body static PET/CT scan using (18)F-FACE (n = 34) and (18)F-FDG (n = 5 for volunteers, n = 8 for patients) on each day, respectively. Qualitative analysis and quantitative analysis of tumors (5 HCCs, 1 cholangiocellular carcinoma, 4 metastatic tumors from colon cancer and P-NET) were performed using SUVmax and tumor-to-normal liver ratio (TNR). RESULTS: In healthy volunteers, (18)F-FACE was metabolically stable in vivo and its biodistribution was almost similar to blood pool, basically uniformly independent of age and gender during PET scan time (up to 3 h). Normal physiological uptake of (18)F-FACE at each organ including liver (SUVmean 1.8 ± 0.2) was lower than that of blood pool (SUVmean 2.3 ± 0.3) at 1 h after injection. Chronic inflammatory uptake around femur of post-operative state of femoral osteotomy and faint uptake of benign hemangioma were observed in a case of healthy volunteer. (18)F-FACE (SUVmax 2.7 ± 0.6, TNR 1.5 ± 0.4) of liver tumors was significantly lower than those of (18)F-FDG uptake (6.5 ± 4.2, 2.6 ± 1.7, respectively). In qualitative analysis, (18)F-FDG was positive in 4 tumors (3 HCCs, 1 CCC) and negative in the other 6 tumors, while (18)F-FACE was also positive in 4 tumors which were the same tumors with positive (18)F-FDG uptake. CONCLUSIONS: Biodistribution of (18)F-FACE was appropriate for oncologic imaging. Tumor (18)F-FACE uptake was positive in four patients with HCC and CCC, but the uptake pattern was similar to (18)F-FDG. Further evaluation was needed.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]