These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Hepatic yttrium-90 radioembolization for metastatic melanoma: a single-center experience. Author: Memon K, Kuzel TM, Vouche M, Atassi R, Lewandowski RJ, Salem R. Journal: Melanoma Res; 2014 Jun; 24(3):244-51. PubMed ID: 24638152. Abstract: The aim of the study was to analyze the safety and efficacy of yttrium-90 ((90)Y) radioembolization in the treatment of unresectable hepatic melanoma metastases refractory to previous systemic/locoregional therapy. Between February 2004 and April 2010, 16 patients with hepatic melanoma metastases (ocular=7, skin=4, other sites=5) were treated with (90)Y radioembolization at a single center. Toxicity was assessed using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria, version 3.0. Response to therapy was assessed by size and necrosis criteria. Progression-free survival (hepatic) and overall survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The median dose to the treatment site was 108.57 Gy. Grade 1 and 2 clinical toxicities included fatigue (44%), nausea (19%), and vomiting (12%). Grade 3 absolute lymphocyte toxicity and aspartate aminotransferase toxicity were noted in 2 (12%) and 1 (7%) patients, respectively. Grade 4 bilirubin toxicity was observed in 1 (7%) patient. Overall, 13 (81%) patients showed disease control (response+stable disease) according to WHO, European Association for the Study of the Liver, and Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors. Progressive disease was observed in 3 (19%) patients according to WHO, European Association for the Study of the Liver, and Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors. The median overall and hepatic progression-free survival times were 7.63 and 4.23 months. Patients with disease control (responders+stable disease) survived longer than those with progressive disease (9.97 vs. 2.13 months, P<0.0001). Results from this small and single-center experience show that radioembolization is a safe therapy and its potential for being an efficacious therapy for hepatic melanoma metastases should be explored further. Radioembolization should be considered for liver-dominant disease refractory to other forms of systemic therapies.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]