These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: [Comparative efficacy of pharmacoinvasive strategy of myocardial reperfusion and primary angioplasty in patients with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction]. Author: Markov VA, Vyshlov EV, Sevast'ianova DS, Filiushkina VIu, Dem'ianov SV, Maksimov IV, Antipov SI, Krylov AL, Varvarenko VI, Gol'tsov SG, Markov VV, Danilenko AM, Karpov RS. Journal: Kardiologiia; 2013; 53(10):10-5. PubMed ID: 24645550. Abstract: In order to assess comparative efficacy of pharmacoinvasive strategy of myocardial reperfusion and primary angioplasty in ST elevation acute myocardial infarction 289 patients were randomized at prehospital stage within first 6 hours of the disease into 2 groups: primary angioplasty (group 1), and prehospital thrombolysis with subsequent rescue or delayed angioplasty depending on efficacy of thrombolysis. We analyzed clinical and anamnestic characteristics of patients, efficacy of reperfusion measures, dimensions of myocardial necrosis, and clinical course of the disease. Pharmacoinvasive myocardial reperfusion with prehospital thrombolysis compared with primary coronary angioplasty decreased time of myocardial ischemia (224.65 +/- 71 vs. 278 +/- 184 min, p < 0.03), increased rate of achievement of TIMI grade 3 flow after percutaneous coronary intervention (80.5% vs. 71.4%, p = 0.002) and more effectively preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (60.0 +/- 14.9% vs. 54.9 +/- 12.3%, p < 0.01). Prehospital thrombolysis before coronary angioplasty compared with primary angioplasty was associated with lower rate of development of no-reflow syndrome (1.4% vs. 11.6%, p < 0.003).[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]