These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with balloon- and self-expandable prostheses: a pooled analysis from a 2-center experience.
    Author: Abdel-Wahab M, Comberg T, Büttner HJ, El-Mawardy M, Chatani K, Gick M, Geist V, Richardt G, Neumann FJ, Segeberg-Krozingen TAVI Registry.
    Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Mar; 7(3):284-92. PubMed ID: 24650401.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess aortic regurgitation (AR) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with the self-expandable Medtronic CoreValve (MCV) (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota) versus balloon-expandable Edwards Sapien XT valve (ESV) (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California). BACKGROUND: AR after TAVI has been associated with poor survival, but limited data exist comparing MCV with ESV. METHODS: We pooled the prospective TAVI databases of 2 German centers. The primary endpoint was more-than-mild post-TAVI AR assessed by echocardiography. We also assessed device success and survival within 1 year. Endpoints were adjudicated according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium criteria and analyzed by unadjusted and propensity-score-adjusted models. RESULTS: A total of 394 patients were included, 276 treated with MCV and 118 with ESV. More-than-mild AR was significantly higher with MCV than with ESV (12.7% vs. 2.6%, p = 0.002). This difference remained significant after propensity adjustment (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 4.59, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03 to 20.44). The occurrence of any degree of AR was also higher with MCV (71.6% vs. 56.9%, p = 0.004). Device success was mainly influenced by the occurrence of AR and was consequently higher with ESV (95.8% vs. 86.6%, p = 0.007), but this was not significant after propensity adjustment (adjusted OR: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.11 to 1.03, p = 0.06). At 1 year, survival was comparable between both valve types (83.8% MCV vs. 88.2% ESV, p = 0.42), but was significantly worse in patients with more-than-mild AR (69.8% vs. 87.4%, p = 0.004) and in those with device failure (65.6% vs. 87.4%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: More-than-mild AR after TAVI was more frequent with MCV than with ESV. This finding deserves consideration, as more-than-mild AR was associated with higher mortality at 1 year.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]