These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [A review of measures taken to improve organizational wellbeing in Italy].
    Author: Bentivenga R, Deitinger P, Ghelli M.
    Journal: G Ital Med Lav Ergon; 2014; 36(1):54-64. PubMed ID: 24665629.
    Abstract:
    INTRODUCTION: The Italian Decree Law D. Lgs. no. 81 dated 9 April 2008, dealing with the implementation of Article 1 of Law No. 123 dated 3 August 2007, on the topic of health and safety in the workplace, indicated that work-related stress (art. 28, section 1) was to be assessed in accordance with the European Agreement of 8 October 2004. It recalled the employer's legal obligation to safeguard workers' health and safety, and included psychosocial risk, in order to improve their wellbeing at work. The Decree Law specified that when risks had been assessed the employer could take all necessary measures, with reference to the "good practice", defined in the Law as organizational or procedural solutions coherent with current regulations and good technical rules, adopted voluntarily with the aim of promoting safety and health in the workplace by reducing risk and improving working conditions [...]" (art. 2, section 1 v); the practical solutions identified were to aim at eliminating, or at least reducing, psychosocial risk in the enterprise. METHOD: On the basis of the studies most widely accepted in Europe and the indications issued by the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work, we identified the good practice measures adopted by companies in Italy and other countries. The aim was to make known some of the practical solutions regarding psychosocial risk that companies can put in place with a view to improving their workers' health and wellbeing. RESULTS: We examined measures related to the content and context of work. Measures affecting the work content mainly involved the workplace itself and equipment, work planning and working hours. For the work context the measures centered mostly on organizational function and culture, career progress, and home/work interface. CONCLUSIONS: In accordance with good safety practice, the practical measures taken by the enterprises examined cantered on some potentially stressful features of work, indicating the growing attention being paid to workers' wellbeing. However, organizational wellbeing is a multifaceted concept and the European Agency points out that measures taken must cover all the aspects of the work that appear particularly critical in risk assessment; from the primary prevention viewpoint, this means all the organizational aspects that might affect a person's wellbeing. As we become increasingly aware of the problems, and of the measures that have proved successful, it is to be hoped that further solutions will be identified and developed in organizations.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]