These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Effect of modifying the screw access channels of zirconia implant abutment on the cement flow pattern and retention of zirconia restorations.
    Author: Wadhwani C, Chung KH.
    Journal: J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jul; 112(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 24680357.
    Abstract:
    STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The effect of managing the screw access channels of zirconia implant abutments in the esthetic zone has not been extensively evaluated. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of an insert placed within the screw access channel of an anterior zirconia implant abutment on the amount of cement retained within the restoration-abutment system and on the dislodging force. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty-six paired zirconia abutments and restorations were fabricated by computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing and were divided into 3 groups: open abutment, with the screw access channel unfilled; closed abutment, with the screw access channel sealed; and insert abutment, with a thin, tubular metal insert projection continuous with the screw head and placed into the abutment screw access channel. The restorations were cemented to the abutments with preweighed eugenol-free zinc oxide cement (TempBond NE). Excess cement was removed, and the weight of the cement that remained in the restoration-abutment system was measured. Vertical tensile dislodging forces were recorded at a crosshead speed of 5 mm/min after incubation in a 37°C water bath for 24 hours. The specimens were examined for the cement flow pattern into the screw access channel after dislodgement. Data were analyzed with ANOVA, followed by multiple comparisons by using the Tukey honestly significant difference test (α = .05). RESULTS: The mean (standard deviation) of retentive force values ranged from 108.1 ± 29.9 N to 148.3 ± 21.0 N. The retentive force values differed significantly between the insert abutment and both the open abutment (P < .05) and closed abutment groups (P < .01). Distinct patterns of cement failure were noted. The weight of the cement that remained in the system differed significantly, with both open abutment and insert abutment being greater than closed abutment (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Modifying the internal configuration of the screw access channel of an esthetic zirconia implant abutment with a metal insert significantly affected both the cement retained within the abutment itself and the retention capabilities of the zirconia restoration cemented with TempBond NE cement.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]