These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Emphysema quantification by combining percentage and size distribution of low-attenuation lung regions.
    Author: Nishio M, Matsumoto S, Koyama H, Yoshikawa T, Sugihara N, Sugimura K, Ohno Y.
    Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 May; 202(5):W453-8. PubMed ID: 24758680.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate efficacy of two types of emphysema quantification: percentage of low-attenuation lung regions (%LA); and size distribution of these regions. On a log-log plot, cumulative frequency-size distribution of low-attenuation lung regions can be fitted by a straight line whose slope (D) has been reported to reflect diffusing capacity. In this study, %LA and D were compared with pulmonary function test (PFT) parameters, especially with ratio of diffusing capacity of carbon monoxide to effective alveolar ventilation (i.e., DLCO/VA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thin-section unenhanced CT images were acquired from 30 patients (25 men, five women; mean [SD] age, 70.1 ± 12.1 years), of whom 25 had received diagnosis of COPD, and %LA and D were calculated at 20 thresholds, ranging from -995 to -900 HU. To determine utility of %LA and D, we used Pearson's correlation for emphysema quantification and PFT. Significance of the coefficients was determined with Bonferroni correction (p < 0.0025). Finally, the relationships between emphysema quantification and DLCO/VA were examined by linear models and Akaike information criterion (AIC). RESULTS: The correlation coefficients for %LA and DLCO/VA were statistically significant at all the thresholds (optimal coefficient, -0.761). The correlation coefficients for D and DLCO/VA were statistically significant at the thresholds from -945 to -900 HU (optimal coefficient, -0.646). AIC values showed that the most accurate prediction of DLCO/VA was obtained by the model incorporating both %LA and D. CONCLUSION: Both %LA and D showed significant correlation with DLCO/VA. Combining %LA and D resulted in more accurate evaluation of DLCO/VA than did using %LA or D alone.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]