These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interaction of N-acetyl procainamide and procainamide in humans.
    Author: Funck-Brentano C, Light RT, Lineberry MD, Wright GM, Roden DM, Woosley RL.
    Journal: J Cardiovasc Pharmacol; 1989 Sep; 14(3):364-73. PubMed ID: 2476614.
    Abstract:
    Procainamide is a sodium channel blocker which prolongs QRS and QTc intervals, yet its major active metabolite, N-acetylprocainamide (NAPA), generally prolongs only QTc and has very different electrophysiologic and antiarrhythmic actions. In greater than 50% of patients receiving chronic treatment with procainamide, plasma concentrations of NAPA exceed those of procainamide. In this study, we examined the hypothesis that NAPA might alter the disposition kinetics or pharmacologic actions of procainamide. Ten patients with frequent ventricular extrasystoles received intravenous (i.v.) infusions of procainamide alone (study day 1), procainamide and NAPA (study day 2), and NAPA alone (study day 3) at least 48 h apart. On study days 1 and 2, procainamide was administered at a constant rate for 4 h. On study days 2 and 3, NAPA was administered as a loading and maintenance infusion designed to reach a target pseudo-equilibrium plasma concentration of 8 micrograms/ml. NAPA increased procainamide elimination half-life (t1/2) from 275 +/- 42 min (mean +/- SD) on day 1 to 340 +/- 74 min on day 2 (p less than 0.01). A significant correlations was noted between the change in procainamide total clearance on day 2 relative to day 1 and the initial procainamide total clearance on day 1 (r = -0.77, p = 0.009). Findings were similar when procainamide fractional urinary excretion was considered (r = -0.89, p = 0.007). NAPA did not alter procainamide-induced QRS prolongation, but potentiated procainamide-induced QTc prolongation. The antiarrhythmic response to procainamide was not significantly altered by NAPA in seven of nine patients. One patient had greater arrhythmia suppression when NAPA and procainamide were combined than when either was administered alone. In one patient, NAPA apparently antagonized procainamide-induced arrhythmia suppression, but this effect was not reproducible. We conclude that accumulation of NAPA during procainamide therapy can alter both procainamide elimination as well as its electrophysiologic actions.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]