These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Beta-adrenoceptor blocking activity of diprafenone in anesthetized dogs: comparison with propafenone and propranolol.
    Author: Greenberg S, Cantor E, Paul J.
    Journal: J Cardiovasc Pharmacol; 1989 Sep; 14(3):444-53. PubMed ID: 2476625.
    Abstract:
    The effects of diprafenone, a new class Ic antiarrhythmic agent, on canine hemodynamics and cardiac membrane beta-receptor antagonist binding activity, were compared with those of propafenone and propranolol. Mongrel dogs (4-5/group) were anesthetized intravenously (i.v.) with pentobarbital sodium (35 mg/kg) and instrumented for measurement of aortic and coronary blood flows (AF, CBF), blood pressure (BP), and heart rate (HR). Isoproterenol (ISO) was administered as bolus injections before (0.01, 0.03, and 0.1 micrograms/kg, i.v.) and after (0.01-3 micrograms/kg, i.v.) infusions of diprafenone or propafenone (0.3, 1, and 3 mg/kg) or propranolol (0.03, 0.1, and 0.3 mg/kg, i.v.). The ability of the antiarrhythmic agents to displace [3H]dihydroalprenolol (DHA) binding from isolated cardiac ventricular membranes in vitro was also evaluated. Each antiarrhythmic agent blocked the HR and BP responses to ISO in a competitive manner and decreased the specific binding of DHA to cardiac ventricular membranes. Propranolol was 2 to 7 times more potent as a beta-receptor blocking agent than diprafenone, which was 6 times more potent than propafenone. The equilibrium dissociation constants (Ki) for displacement of DHA by propranolol, diprafenone, and propafenone were 2.7, 14.3, and 252 nM, respectively, and have the same rank order of potency for in vivo inhibition of BP and HR responses to ISO. Diprafenone has significant beta-adrenoceptor blocking activity which may contribute to its efficacy as an antiarrhythmic agent and allow its use in treatment of arrhythmias refractory to therapy with class I and class II agents alone.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]