These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Comparison of some recent methods for the differentiation of elevated serum amylase and the detection of macroamylasaemia.
    Author: Van Deun A, Cobbaert C, Van Orshoven A, Claeys G, Lissens W.
    Journal: Ann Clin Biochem; 1989 Sep; 26 ( Pt 5)():422-6. PubMed ID: 2479317.
    Abstract:
    A pancreatic isoamylase method (Pancreatic Alpha-Amylase EPS, Boehringer) that uses monoclonal antibodies showed almost complete immunoinhibition of salivary (S) amylase activity with only a minor decrease of pancreatic (P) amylase activity. The method displayed good sensitivity and linearity. The correlations of P-amylase activities determined by this technique with a wheat-germ inhibition method and with agarose electrophoresis followed by densitometric scanning were excellent. However, both the wheat-germ and monoclonal inhibition methods failed to detect macroamylasaemia. To recognise macroamylases we used the PEG precipitation method and confirmed the results with agarose electrophoresis. Of 161 serum samples with elevated amylase activities, only four out of five with macroamylasaemia were detected by the PEG precipitation method. No false positives were demonstrated. After PEG precipitation of 28 samples, P-amylase determinations were performed on the supernatants. Again, four out of five with macroamylasaemia were recognised. We consider P-amylase measurement and, when macroamylasaemia is suspected, the combined use of the PEG precipitation method and P-amylase or total amylase determination to be the most practical way to differentiate between elevated serum amylase levels.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]