These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Three-dimensional contrast enhanced ultrasound score and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging score in evaluating breast tumor angiogenesis: correlation with biological factors.
    Author: Jia WR, Chai WM, Tang L, Wang Y, Fei XC, Han BS, Chen M.
    Journal: Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jul; 83(7):1098-1105. PubMed ID: 24794865.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To explore the clinical value of three-dimensional contrast enhanced ultrasound (3D-CEUS) and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) score systems in evaluating breast tumor angiogenesis by comparing their diagnostic efficacy and correlation with biological factors. METHODS: 3D-CEUS was performed in 183 patients with breast tumors by Esaote Mylab90 with SonoVue (Bracco, Italy), DCE-MRI was performed on a dedicated breast magnetic resonance imaging (DBMRI) system (Aurora Dedicated Breast MRI Systems, USA) with a dedicated breast coil. 3D-CEUS and DCE-MRI score systems were created based on tumor perfusion and vascular characteristics. Microvessel density (MVD), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and matrix metalloproteinases (MMP-2, MMP-9) expression were measured by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Pathological results showed 35 benign and 148 malignant breast tumors. MVD (P=0.000, r=0.76), VEGF (P=0.000, r=0.55), MMP-2 (P=0.000, r=0.39) and MMP-9 (P=0.000, r=0.41) expression were all significantly different between benignity and malignancy. Regarding 3D-CEUS 4 points as cutoff value, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were 85.1%, 94.3% and 86.9%, respectively, and correlated well with MVD (P=0.000, r=0.50), VEGF (P=0.000, r=0.50), MMP-2 (P=0.000, r=0.50) and MMP-9 (P=0.000, r=0.66). Taking DCE-MRI 5 points as cutoff value, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were 86.5%, 94.3% and 88.0%, respectively and also correlated well with MVD (P=0.000, r=0.52), VEGF (P=0.000, r=0.44), MMP-2 (P=0.000, r=0.42) and MMP-9 (P=0.000, r=0.35). CONCLUSIONS: 3D-CEUS score system displays inspiring diagnostic performance and good agreement with DCE-MRI scoring. Moreover, both score systems correlate well with MVD, VEGF, MMP-2 and MMP-9 expression, and thus have great potentials in tumor angiogenesis evaluation.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]