These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: The use of cone-beam computed tomography to determine cochlear implant electrode position in human temporal bones.
    Author: Saeed SR, Selvadurai D, Beale T, Biggs N, Murray B, Gibson P, Risi F, Boyd P.
    Journal: Otol Neurotol; 2014 Sep; 35(8):1338-44. PubMed ID: 24809280.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To assess the utility of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging in the estimation of cochlear implant (CI) electrode position in implanted temporal bones. STUDY DESIGN: Eight fresh frozen temporal bones were mounted and oriented as for standard surgery and were implanted with Cochlear Slim-Straight (SS) or Contour Advance electrode arrays by 2 CI surgeons. The bones were then imaged using an Accuitomo F170 CBCT scanner (isometric 250 μm voxel size) and were then processed for histologic sectioning (500 μm sections). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The CBCT images and the histologic micrographs (providing the "gold standard") were examined independently by several observers who assessed the scalar position (tympani or vestibuli) of each electrode in each temporal bone specimen. RESULTS: Examination of the histologic micrographs confirmed that all electrodes were positioned within the scala tympani in all 8 bones. Similar judgments were made by the observers rating the CBCT images, except that one of the 2 observers estimated some of the apical electrodes to be located in the scala vestibuli in two of the bones implanted with the SS electrode. CONCLUSION: Cone-beam CT imaging is able to provide a good indication of the scalar position of implanted electrodes, although estimation may be slightly less reliable for apical electrodes and for straight electrode designs. Additional advantages of using CBCT for this purpose are shorter acquisition time and reduction of radiation dose as compared with conventional CT.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]