These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Target hematologic values in the management of essential thrombocythemia and polycythemia vera.
    Author: Hernández-Boluda JC, Gómez M.
    Journal: Eur J Haematol; 2015 Jan; 94(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 24814134.
    Abstract:
    Treatment of essential thrombocythemia (ET) and polycythemia vera (PV) is aimed at preventing vascular complications, which are the main cause of morbidity and mortality in these diseases. Over the years, clinical trials have demonstrated that the incidence of thrombosis and bleeding can be reduced by controlling the blood cell counts, but the target hematological levels have varied across the studies. In this article, we review the evidence supporting the use of predefined target hematologic values for the management of ET and PV in routine clinical practice. At present, the recommended target hematocrit in PV is below 45%, regardless of the patients' risk profile. Concerning platelet counts, no direct correlation has been demonstrated with thrombotic risk in either ET or PV. Thus, although cytoreductive treatment reduces the rate of vascular complications in high-risk patients, no particular threshold of the platelet counts has been shown to be more protective against thrombosis. Extreme thrombocytosis is a risk factor for bleeding, particularly when aspirin or anagrelide are given. Leukocytosis at baseline or during follow-up appears to be a risk factor for thrombosis, mostly in high-risk patients. However, the clinical benefit of strictly controlling this parameter is not yet established. Finally, standardized definitions of response to cytoreductive treatment in ET and PV have recently been published. Nevertheless, they have been produced to compare the efficacy of new therapies in clinical trials, whereas its relevance in clinical practice has been questioned in retrospective studies showing that such response definitions do not correlate with the patients' clinical outcome.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]