These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: [Intraobserver reliability of the Handball-specific complex test (HBKT)]. Author: Schwesig R, Koke A, Jungermann P, Fischer D, Noack F, Becker S, Fieseler G, Delank KS. Journal: Sportverletz Sportschaden; 2014 Sep; 28(3):146-54. PubMed ID: 24853986. Abstract: BACKGROUND: There are clearly no complex and sports-specific tests in handball. So far, no specific complex test has been developed and verified for its intraobserver reliability (IR). OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the IR of the Handball-specific complex test (HBKT). METHODS: The HBKT was applied twice at an interval of two days to two teams of the German Third League (n = 30; age 25.7 ± 3.9 years, range: 19 - 33 years). Within the HBKT, the stress parameters lactate and heart rate as well as the loading parameters time, throwing velocity and number of errors were collected. RESULTS: Overall, 23 % (3/13) of the stress parameters showed a high relative [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) > 0.75] and absolute [coefficient of variation (CV) ≤ 5 %] IR. On average, a sufficient absolute (∅CV = 11.3 %) and relative (∅ICC = 0.67) IR was observed. Without the parameters "missed throws" and "technical errors" in both rounds, the IR increased significantly (∅ICC: from 0.67 to 0.72 & ∅CV from 11.3 to 6.3 %). The heart rate was comparatively more reliable than lactate (∅ICC = 0.71 & ∅CV = 4.23 % vs. ∅ICC = 0.65 & ∅CV = 15.1 %). With respect to load parameters in round one, 50 % (5/10) showed a high IR; in round two, these values decreased to 40 % (4/10). The mean IR of the parameters in round one was higher than in round two (∅ICC = 0.71 & ∅CV = 12.2 % vs. ∅ICC = 0.60 & ∅CV = 14.3 %). Overall, there was an improvement of the athletes in most stress and load parameters from session one to session two. CONCLUSIONS: The HBKT can be attested with a sufficient intraobserver reliability. When the parameters "missed throws" and "technical errors" were excluded, the IR further increased significantly. Therefore, these parameters should be recorded in order to standardized the HBKT, but not be included in the statistical analysis. There are discrete adaptation and learning effects. For this reason, it is essential to familiarise trainers and players with the HBKT test procedure before the first measurement. Otherwise training effects can be easily overrated. Moreover, the test concept of HBKT can be used as a blueprint for the development of sport-specific tests in other team sports (e. g., soccer, basketball). For example, we generated a complex soccer-specific field test 1 based on the HBKT.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]