These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Ulnar impaction syndrome: incidence of lunotriquetral ligament degeneration and outcome of ulnar-shortening osteotomy. Author: Iwatsuki K, Tatebe M, Yamamoto M, Shinohara T, Nakamura R, Hirata H. Journal: J Hand Surg Am; 2014 Jun; 39(6):1108-13. PubMed ID: 24862111. Abstract: PURPOSE: We hypothesized that most patients with ulnar impaction syndrome have degenerative changes of the proximal lunotriquetral (LT) membrane and that ulnar-shortening osteotomy is an effective procedure in these patients. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 50 wrists of 49 patients with idiopathic ulnar impaction syndrome who underwent an arthroscopic evaluation at the time of ulnar-shortening osteotomy, and subsequently at plate removal. Based on the Geissler classification, patients were divided into group A, normal, and group B, grades I to IV. The degree of degeneration of the proximal LT membrane at first-look arthroscopy was compared with that at second-look arthroscopy. RESULTS: After ulnar-shortening osteotomy, both groups improved significantly in wrist range of motion and grip strength. According to the Mayo wrist score, 29, 18, and 3 patients showed excellent, good, and fair results, respectively. Of the 50 wrists, 25 had degenerative changes (group B) in the proximal LT membrane at the time of first-look arthroscopy. Of the 25 wrists in group B, 11 wrists improved based on the Geissler grade, 9 wrists showed no changes, and 2 wrists became worse. Clinically, patients demonstrated improvement after ulnar-shortening osteotomy regardless of the degree of degenerative LT ligament changes. CONCLUSIONS: Degenerative LT membrane changes that were seen in about half of our patients were mostly of a mild nature, and the clinical outcomes of ulnar-shortening osteotomy were acceptable. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]