These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Use of a rectal spacer with low-dose-rate brachytherapy for treatment of prostate cancer in previously irradiated patients: Initial experience and short-term results.
    Author: Mahal BA, Ziehr DR, Hyatt AS, Neubauer-Sugar EH, O'Farrell DA, O'Leary MP, Steele GS, Niedermayr TR, Beard CJ, Martin NE, Orio PF, D'Amico AV, Devlin PM, Nguyen PL.
    Journal: Brachytherapy; 2014; 13(5):442-9. PubMed ID: 24880584.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Salvage brachytherapy in patients with prior pelvic radiation carries a risk of rectal injury. Herein, we report our initial experience using a hydrogel spacer between the prostate and the rectum during salvage brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 11 patients with prostate cancer and prior radiotherapy (5 prostate brachytherapy, 2 prostate external beam radiation therapy [EBRT], and 4 rectal cancer EBRT) received (125)I brachytherapy after attempted placement of 10cc of a diluted hydrogel spacer between the prostate and rectum. RESULTS: Spacing was achieved in 8 of the 11 (73%) patients but was not possible in 3 (1 prior brachytherapy and 2 prior EBRT) owing to fibrosis and adhesions. For the 8 patients in whom spacing was accomplished, the median space between the prostate and rectum was 10.9mm (prior EBRT) vs. 7.7mm (prior brachytherapy), p=0.048. Median followup was 15.7 months. One patient developed a prostato-rectal fistula requiring a diverting colostomy. The 16-month estimate of late Grade 3 or 4 gastrointestinal or genitourinary toxicity was 26%. One patient developed lymph node-positive recurrence. The 16-month prostate-specific antigen failure-free survival rate was 89%. Compared with baseline, Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite for Clinical Practice urinary quality of life (QoL) was significantly worse at 3 and 6 months but not significantly worse by 1 year. There were no significant changes throughout the study period in bowel or sexual QoL. CONCLUSION: Hydrogel spacer placements may be feasible in most patients with prior pelvic radiation. Further followup is needed to determine whether spacer placement will produce long-term improvements in toxicity or QoL.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]