These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Comparison of Von Willebrand factor (VWF) activity VWF:Ac with VWF ristocetin cofactor activity VWF:RCo.
    Author: Geisen U, Zieger B, Nakamura L, Weis A, Heinz J, Michiels JJ, Heilmann C.
    Journal: Thromb Res; 2014 Aug; 134(2):246-50. PubMed ID: 24891215.
    Abstract:
    INTRODUCTION: Ristocetin cofactor activity of Von Willebrand factor (VWF:RCo) and the ratio VWF:RCo to its antigen VWF:Ag are used as routine screening to estimate VWF function and to detect types of Von Willebrand disease (VWD) caused by loss of high molecular weight multimers. However, the VWF:RCo test is prone to analytic imprecisions due to various reasons. We compared an assay for VWF activity (VWF:Ac) with VWF:RCo putting emphasis on the ratios to VWF:Ag. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated 942 samples from 432 patients and evaluated three groups in detail: normal patients (normal multimers, VWF:Ag and VWF:RCo >0.5 U/ml, VWD type 1 excluded; n=258), VWD type 1 (n=76) and acquired Von Willebrand syndrome (AVWS, n=326). In addition, 30 healthy subjects were analysed. RESULTS: VWF:Ac and VWF:RCo correlated well (Pearson´s r=0.96, p<0.01), so did their ratios to VWF:Ag (Pearson´s r=0.82, p<0.01). We calculated the normal range of VWF:Ac/VWF:Ag for healthy subjects as 0.8-1.16. In comparison, the reference range (mean±2std) derived from normal patient samples was 0.73-1.14. The corresponding ranges for VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag came to 0.74-1.23 (healthy) and 0.62-1.25 (normal patients). The ratios showed similar results regarding VWD type 1. The sensitivity for AVWS was higher with VWF:Ac/VWF:Ag than with VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag (97.5% versus 84.7%). CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that the results obtained with the VWF:Ac assay are comparable to that of the VWF:RCo assay. An AVWS was more reliably detected by VWF:Ac/VWF:Ag. We assume that the VWF:Ac assay could replace VWF:RCo for routine screening for AVWS, especially when prompt evaluation is required.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]