These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Estimated trans-lamina cribrosa pressure difference versus intraocular pressure as biomarker for open-angle glaucoma. The Beijing Eye Study 2011.
    Author: Jonas JB, Wang NL, Wang YX, You QS, Xie XB, Yang DY, Xu L.
    Journal: Acta Ophthalmol; 2015 Feb; 93(1):e7-e13. PubMed ID: 24961652.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: To examine whether an estimated trans-lamina cribrosa pressure difference (TLCPD) better than intraocular pressure (IOP) correlated with markers for glaucoma. METHODS: The population-based Beijing Eye Study 2011 included 3468 individuals. Cerebrospinal fluid pressure (CSFP) was calculated as CSFP [mmHg] = 0.44 × Body Mass Index [kg/m(2) ] + 0.16 × Diastolic Blood Pressure [mmHg] - 0.18 × Age [Years] - 1.91. TLCPD was IOP-CSFP. RESULTS: In the non-glaucomatous population, mean TLCPD was 5.8 ± 4.1 mmHg and mean estimated CSFP was 8.9 ± 3.7 mmHg. IOP was higher (p = 0.008), CSFP was lower (p < 0.001), and TLCPD was (p < 0.001) higher in the glaucoma group than in the non-glaucomatous group. The intergroup difference was highest for TLCPD (2.1 mmHg) followed by CSFP (1.7 mmHg) and IOP (0.4 mmHg). Open-angle glaucoma (OAG) was associated with higher TLCPD [p < 0.001; odds ratio (OR): 1.14; 95% confidence intervals (CI): 1.08, 1.19] but not with IOP (p = 0.22; OR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.89, 1.03). In contrast, angle-closure glaucoma (ACG) was associated with higher IOP (p = 0.03; B: 0.14; OR: 1.15; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.30) but not with TLCPD (p = 0.98), after adjustment for age and anterior chamber depth. Retinal nerve fibre layer thickness was associated with lower TLCPD (p = 0.036) but not with IOP (p = 0.96), after adjusting for gender, age, region of habitation, optic disc area and refractive error. Neuroretinal area and volume were associated with smaller TLCPD (p = 0.002, and p < 0.001, respectively), after adjusting for gender, optic disc area and refractive error, but not with IOP (p = 0.43 and p = 0.25, resp.). CONCLUSIONS: In OAG, but not in ACG, calculated TLCPD versus IOP showed a better association with glaucoma presence and amount of glaucomatous optic neuropathy. It supports the notion of a potential role of low CSFP in the pathogenesis of OAG.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]